Why Do I Have to Pick One?

file76479As I read more about writing center philosophy, I constantly come across clashing ideas—the editor vs. the tutor; peer tutors vs. authoritative tutors; nondirective vs. directive methods, etc. And most authors strongly pick one side or the other.

One such opinionated person is Jeff Brooks who, in his article “Minimalist Tutoring: Making the Student Do All the Work,” states very clearly that writing center consultants should be tutors, not editors. Brooks even goes so far as to say, “If you find a student pushing you too hard into editing his paper, physically move away from it” (132). I was shocked that Brooks wants me to act so repulsed by editing. If line edits, grammar, and punctuation are truly the subjects the writer wishes to discuss, why should I, as a tutor, withhold my knowledge? In fact, Peter Carino suggests that withholding knowledge is an abuse of power (122), which is a bold yet, I believe, accurate statement.

Brooks’s simple-minded view of a writing center consultation completely disregards the individual and diverse needs of the writers. He sticks with the long-held writing center tradition of making better writers, not better papers, but I am confused as to why we cannot do both. Making better writers creates better papers, and vice versa; what we should be doing is reading the situation—the writer, the assignment, the paper—and using whatever tactics we determine will be most helpful.

Linda K. Shamoon and Deborah H. Burns discuss alternative methods of tutoring in “A Critique of Pure Tutoring,” many of which reminded me of helpful processes that have benefited me in the past. Shamoon and Burns talk about “master classes” in music teaching where students learn from an IMG_8445expert by imitating or emulating the student. (Here’s a modern example of a master class with Pharrell Williams.) I saw nothing wrong with this way of learning, but many professors might argue that imitation and plagiarism are essentially the same. I would point out that writers have been emulating each other for much longer than writing centers have existed, and most were not plagiarizing.

Many writers draw inspiration from their favorite authors or books, sometimes even emulating the author’s style to enhance their own writing later. In my Intro to Fiction Writing class last semester, Professor Jennine Capó Crucet had us write “remixes” of our own stories based on different authors’ styles. This helped us add new tools to our writing toolboxes. But we never plagiarized, because we applied the concepts to our own writing. This style of teaching was extremely effective for many of us in the class, and using methods like this in the writing center could be beneficial.

Learning through imitation is NOT plagiarism! There are definitely right and wrong ways to emulate someone else’s writing, but Shamoon and Burns hit it on the nose when they say, “Rather than assuming this imitation will prevent authentic self-expression, the tutor and the student assume that imitation will lead to improved technique, which will enable freedom of expression” (140). Even though they are discussing music master classes, this statement may as well apply to writing center consultations. Many people learn by imitating. It’s how I learn certain concepts. When I used to play tennis, I had to watch someone else serve a certain way before I could try it myself. This practice only becomes “unethical” when applied to writing, which cuts off access to many beneficial writing practices.

Both figuring something out by yourself and learning from someone else are valuable processes. A writing tutor has to


We can have the best of both worlds!

determine what is best for the writer during the time they have together. The same goes for Carino’s debate between “peerness” and “authority.” Tutors have to possess a little of both. Sometimes, if a writer knows something the tutor doesn’t, it is best to use the question-and-answer technique, just two people talking about a paper. If a student seems to be struggling or the tutor has information that will help said student, the tutor should take some authority and help the writer.

I can edit and tutor. I can be a peer and an authority figure. As long as I am genuinely helping the writer, I know that I am doing the right thing, no matter what all of this writing center literature tells me.

Works Cited

Brooks, Jeff. “Minimalist Tutoring: Making the Student Do All the Work.” The St. Martin’s Sourcebook for Writing Tutors, 1991, pp. 128-132.

Carino, Peter. “Power and Authority in Peer Tutoring.” The St. Martin’s Sourcebook for Writing Tutors, 2003, pp. 112-127.

Shamoon, Linda K. and Deborah H. Burns. “A Critique of Pure Tutoring.” The St. Martin’s Sourcebook for Writing Tutors, 1995, pp. 133-148.





This entry was posted in writing center and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Why Do I Have to Pick One?

  1. Pingback: Writing Center Visit – Planners and Pizza

  2. Hi Kathryn,

    First off, I just want to say I love this post and that the Hannah Montana post was spot on. I love being able to make the writing center a place where I can get the “best of both worlds.” I like the argument you made in addressing the student’s needs and how the consultant must learn to weild both “authority” and “peerless” to address these needs.

    Early on in your post you made a point about the turning process is one that is diverse, I think when thinking of the writing center we must think of it as a place of diversity and collaboration. In thinking this we come to understand that the roles we play are not as hard and fast rule baring tutors but rather that we understand the diversity of the tutors needs. In this understanding is how we derive good tutoring practicies that embrace all issues.


  3. Isaac Wahlmeier says:

    Dearest Kathryn B,
    I love you Hannah Montana quote. It doth bring me life.
    In my education class, we talk about the concept of modeling for visual learners. These students learn best by observing demonstration and recreating it in their own way. I feel as if these writers could benefit from these concepts. Again, it always depends on the consultation! If one method does not work, try another!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s